Vannizzlefashizzal said:
people remember liverpool cos they ram it down everyones throats and of the three teams they are much bigger
[size=+7]5 TIMES[/size]
english teams dominated europe through the 70's up until 85
liverpool, 4 european cups & 2 uefa cups
forest, 2 european cups
villa, 1 european cup
spurs, 2 uefa cups
ipswich, 1 eufa cup
chelsea, everton & man city all won the cup winners cup
it shows just how strong the english game was at that time and they all deserve credit but liverpool stand out because of 8 league titles, 1 fa cup & 4 league cups won in the same period of time
all through this thread you've tried to belittle everything liverpool achieved in this era but the facts speak for themselves
as for playing boring football i've not got a clue what you're on about, 78/79 was probably our best league performance during that era and we finished up with a goal difference of +69 (the only team thats got anywhere near that in the modern era is chelsea last season with +57) and conceded only 16 goals, only 5 games were won 1-0 and our results included 7-0, 6-0 & 5-0 wins, boring my arse fact was we were just as capable of going out and hammering teams as united were during the 90's
notice you also conveniently forgot to mention the team from 87 to 90 which played some of the best football i've ever seen and easily compares to that of united during the 90's
in terms of success it was englands best period in europe, but ask anyone who followed and went to the games during that time, it wasnt a good time, remember it bred the atmosphere that led us to two stadium disasters.
what the fuck that has to do with question in the first post is beyond me, yeah there was a lot of trouble especially in the 70's and early 80's but that has nothing to do with what happened on the pitch, liverpool won all those trophies because they were a great side with great management
and what happened at hillsborough has nothing to do with trouble between fans, it was down to poor stadium design and the actions of the police