I just watched the second half. Very good attacking performance but abysmal defending.
Santos is indeed a disaster and Sagna is a shadow of his former self.
But i blame 50% on the fact that Arsenal never (never !) has had a a really good GK: Seaman, Lehmann, Almunia, and the current one (i'm sorry no disprespect to the guy but i'm sick and tired of his name)...Seaman was overrated like almost every English GK (the last world class GK England has had was Gordon Banks, one of the best ever even, but Shilton, Seaman and Hart are all tragically overrated).
A team like Arsenal needs a top 20 GK, Lehman has been a top 20 GK, but never when he played forArsenal. Seaman was at best a top 50 GK and Szeszny (or whatever) isn't even in the top 100. Hell both Gk from my favourite belgian team are better than him and that is their weak link...
Yesterday Bobby replied to my post about your Polish GK's lack of presence that De Gea hasn't got the presence Schmeichel has. I agree with that, but De Gea has outstanding reflexes and then you need presence less. Maybe i missed quite a lot but IMO Szeszny isn't a good instinctive goal keeper...He is decent overall, but not a GK for a club who has defensive weaknesses for years now...
I enjoyed watching Arsenal yesterday, but imo 2-2 is not a good result (for both teams). Iwanted Arsenal to win, but was over the moon because my favourite Brittish player scored (Henderson).
Seaman was a great keeper imo (although he was backed up by a great defence most of the time) I don't know if he was in the top 20 goalkeepers at the time, but for Arsenal he was fantastic. Lehmann was unpredictable but I also loved him and again he wasn't the best goalkeeper in the world at all, but we had him and we were INVINCIBLE! (

)
So I don't think you need a top 20 goalkeeper, you need a very good keeper that is willing to fight and win and gives your defence confidence. Szcz is by no means the finished article, but I believe he can be a very good and with his love for the club is invaluable, he deserves the patience given to him at the moment. Top 20 I don't care, as long as he does well for Arsenal.
He made a couple of poor decisions yesterday (The pissing about at the back and going for the corner where it had to be cleared off of the line) but he also made a couple of great saves. When he came out to Henderson at the edge of the area (and Henderson tried to lob him) I thought he made the right decision as if he stayed in goal it would have been a much easier chance for Henderson to score. It was unorthodox and looked like a mistake, but I though he did well, especially when Henderson kept it just outside of the area and Szcz didn't dive in our do anything rash.
He will make mistakes, but he will learn from them (Hopefully) and get better and better.
MAybe he isn't the best keeper to have at the moment with our mentally fragile defence, but if we got in a more experienced keeper to be our no.1 I think it will have much more of a detrimental effect on Szcz than a positive. It might be better for Arsenal in the short term, but in the long term I would rather stick with Szcz.
Our defence has serious mental issues though, they are very aware of themselves fucking up and this is leading to them concentrating to hard and trying not to make mistakes, which is making them make mistakes.
I remember when I was younger and would walk past a hot girl and I wanted to walk cool etc but the more I thought about it, the more weird my walk would be and didn't look cool at all.....This is what is happening with our defenders and a psychologist needs to come in and sort them all out
