Dominic
Serie A
- 19 August 2003
Re: Serie A Thread
I can't agree.
There was a reason, why Napoli already conceded thrice, and it wasn't just due to Milan's brilliant attack. My man of the first half was Pirlo. He could just stroll right through Napoli's midfield and he had all the time and space in the world to supply the forwards. Seedorf as well had so much space to manouver in, e.g. his assist for Ronaldo's second. Look how easily Seedorf came to the ball when he scored that rebound, despite being surrounded by so many defenders. In that same move, where Pato got the ball twice, while being completely outnumbered. Same thing when Ronaldo scored. A brilliant assist by Pirlo(who for me is perhaps Milan's best player, despite those big names upfront), but again.. acres of space to do his thing.
Napoli's pushing forward made for a great match, but it was also suicidal.
If you look at the teams Milan struggled to beat this season, it was against opponents who came to the San Siro with a defensive attitude. Teams kept the pitch small and closed down the spaces quickly. Nullified the midfield support.
If look at Milan vs Siena, Parma, Empoli, Torni, Juventus.. They all went wrong for Milan, because the latter teams managed to keep it tight. Napoli did the exact opposite like Lazio and Sampdoria and subsequently got their asses handed to them.
Yes sure, but sometimes(quite often actually) a coach should choose cynisicm and realism above sentimentalism.
Yes sure, but that's even more reason why Napoli's gameplan was foolish.
I agree about Hamisk by the way, incredible youngster.
i'd say napoli looked pretty balanced and "short" till milan's third goal. then the team got "stretched", trying to score one more time, and this helped milan a lot.
I can't agree.
There was a reason, why Napoli already conceded thrice, and it wasn't just due to Milan's brilliant attack. My man of the first half was Pirlo. He could just stroll right through Napoli's midfield and he had all the time and space in the world to supply the forwards. Seedorf as well had so much space to manouver in, e.g. his assist for Ronaldo's second. Look how easily Seedorf came to the ball when he scored that rebound, despite being surrounded by so many defenders. In that same move, where Pato got the ball twice, while being completely outnumbered. Same thing when Ronaldo scored. A brilliant assist by Pirlo(who for me is perhaps Milan's best player, despite those big names upfront), but again.. acres of space to do his thing.
Napoli's pushing forward made for a great match, but it was also suicidal.
If you look at the teams Milan struggled to beat this season, it was against opponents who came to the San Siro with a defensive attitude. Teams kept the pitch small and closed down the spaces quickly. Nullified the midfield support.
If look at Milan vs Siena, Parma, Empoli, Torni, Juventus.. They all went wrong for Milan, because the latter teams managed to keep it tight. Napoli did the exact opposite like Lazio and Sampdoria and subsequently got their asses handed to them.
u have to understand Don, that there is an historic rivalry between milan and napoli. this match is a "classic". napoli fans had huge expectations from this match and so, when the team was loosing 3-2 the players HAD to show they were doing their best to get a draw.
but "impetus" is the first enemy of "balance", so...:roll:
Yes sure, but sometimes(quite often actually) a coach should choose cynisicm and realism above sentimentalism.
Moreover sunday napoli was missing Blasi, who is the most important piece of napoli's puzzle. Bogliacino and Gargano push a lot and without blasi behind them, napoli looses a "benchmark player" at midfield.
Yes sure, but that's even more reason why Napoli's gameplan was foolish.
I agree about Hamisk by the way, incredible youngster.



