I don't like this idea. Why? Why would you do this? It wouldn't give players like Eto'o or others a chance to play for the best teams, as a Cameroonian league with all the Cameroonians would still not ever be as good as the Brazilian or Italian leagues, where he owuld hypothetically belong in a situation like that. Plus, you've got corruption and mismanagement in environments such as Brazil, where if all of the Brazilian players played they would be ousted out of their World Class status by club bigwigs. And an introduction of this rule, wouldn't it basically nullify national team competitions?
Frankly, I like the transfer season. It gives me something to hope for, to look ahead for. I like discovering new and previously hidden gems, sort of like in FIFA or FM, but real. This is completely unfair to the best players in not-so good countries, like I mentioned with Eto'o, but also, say, with Gudjohnsen, or someone like Bruce Grobelaar.
Thirdly, this stifles new ideas and implementation of tactics in any country. If only English players were in the Premier League, that would really stagnate any stylistic development that would otherwise qbe readily attainable in a free-transfer world. Tactics would be nearly the same (although admittedly far from it, but more so than nowadays), and football wouldn't develop.
This, of course, brings up the question of if international managers would be able to manage teams from other countries, or for that matter, if chairmen should. If so, then it would be completely unfair to the players playing under those managers, and actually to any player at all. Plus, in countries such as Zimbabwe where Grobelaar hails from, there wouldn't be enough managers with any ability or clout to manage the teams. Some clubs would get the "cream of the crop", but the rest would be subject to playing under a guy who knows his tactics from playing Footie Manager. That wouldn't work.
Next, if the economy of a country collapses and many of the countries clubs would need to be liquidated or downsized, what would happen then? Do the players of said clubs simply retire, as they have nowhere else to go?
Lastly, it needs to be mentioned that not all clubs can manage to play a superstar player what he wants, or deserves. A team in Cote d'Ivoire, let's say, that included Droba, the two Toure's, and a host of other brilliant footballers, would simply not be able to support the players' fiscal desires. Spreading out the players over a number of clubs wouldn't work either, as 1) this would restrict players' movement even further than it already has been, and 2) this would deepen the factor of "ability gap", where an absolutely brilliant player is forced to play for a hideously substandard team.
I simply don't like this idea. Feel free to destroy anything I just said, and then watch your reply get destroyed by ME.
