lo zio
International
- 24 October 2005
- Palermo
Re: Serie A Thread
:lol::lol: Yep, that’s an absolute truth. It’s imposible to have a perfect refereeing, for many reasons.
First of all because refereeing involves also a personal interpretation of the rules (which is usually different for each referee and for each refereeing school, the english one, the italian, the german, the spanish, the french, etc…). so for each match there are usually many “border line cases”. For those cases debating is almost useless as we could not consider them as fault, while the ref did it (and also another ref could have given a different interpretation of that case).
The second reason instead is highly debatable. Many people say that football nowadays is a lot faster than 20, 30, 40 years ago, wich makes the ref’s duty even harder. The ref has always to follow the action. While a player can have some moments of rest during the game (especially cbs and fowards) the ref runs for the whole match. Moreover he has to coordinate his position on the pitch to the players position, to avoid influencing the game. And finally he has always to be cool; no matter how much he runs, he can’t be tired coz when something happens on the pitch he must have the coolness to take the most appropriate decision (he must have a huge stamina, coz when u pant, when u run out of oxygen, u can’t take a fast and clear-headed decision).
That’s absolutely true.
But saying that 20, 30, 40 years ago refs used to make less mistakes is wrong, imo. The only big difference is that now each mistakes is captured by many cameras.
I heard a nice interview to Altafini time ago. He said “u guys have no idea of what used to happen on a football pitch 40 years ago; puches, kicks, everything happened on the field. And often the refs couldn’t notice them, as it happens today. Actually the situation was even worse than nowadays, as now our refs face a better athletic training, that allows them to be more aware. But the real difference is that 40 years ago, neither the people could notice those faults as there were no cameras on the pitch. Then the number of the cameras increased in the last 20 years and now each match is usually captured from 20\25 different point of views.”
Here u’r making a very interesting point, mate. I’ve always thought that it could be a nice idea if we could have a continental referees association, with the same interpretation rules. This could allow us to exchange our referees. We could see an english ref refereeing in serie a or an italian ref refereeing in bundesliga. This could bring several advantages for each of us, imo. The fairness of the refs would be even more guarranteed and we all could share the same refereeing interpretation criteria.
Football today is highly globalised (as everything, btw); each year our clubs face each others in european competitions and we often see our teams complaining about the refs in champions league and uefa cup matches.
English refs are usually quite permissive, while italian ones usually use a lot their whistles.
This difference, of course, has a big influence on the game, when 2 clubs from different leagues face each others.
Premiership players usually try hard tackles as those tackles aren’t fouls in their national league, while spanish an italian players are usually more careful (a little too careful) as it’s easier to commit a foul in their own leagues.
Sharing our refs could put an end to theese difference and this would be a step foward, imo
What do u guys think about it?
P.s. i'm glad to see u posting here again, Vanzandt
Just reading the posts and was thinking of paraphrasing Twain.
The only three certainties in life are death, taxes and refereeing mistakes!
:lol::lol: Yep, that’s an absolute truth. It’s imposible to have a perfect refereeing, for many reasons.
First of all because refereeing involves also a personal interpretation of the rules (which is usually different for each referee and for each refereeing school, the english one, the italian, the german, the spanish, the french, etc…). so for each match there are usually many “border line cases”. For those cases debating is almost useless as we could not consider them as fault, while the ref did it (and also another ref could have given a different interpretation of that case).
The second reason instead is highly debatable. Many people say that football nowadays is a lot faster than 20, 30, 40 years ago, wich makes the ref’s duty even harder. The ref has always to follow the action. While a player can have some moments of rest during the game (especially cbs and fowards) the ref runs for the whole match. Moreover he has to coordinate his position on the pitch to the players position, to avoid influencing the game. And finally he has always to be cool; no matter how much he runs, he can’t be tired coz when something happens on the pitch he must have the coolness to take the most appropriate decision (he must have a huge stamina, coz when u pant, when u run out of oxygen, u can’t take a fast and clear-headed decision).
That’s absolutely true.
But saying that 20, 30, 40 years ago refs used to make less mistakes is wrong, imo. The only big difference is that now each mistakes is captured by many cameras.
I heard a nice interview to Altafini time ago. He said “u guys have no idea of what used to happen on a football pitch 40 years ago; puches, kicks, everything happened on the field. And often the refs couldn’t notice them, as it happens today. Actually the situation was even worse than nowadays, as now our refs face a better athletic training, that allows them to be more aware. But the real difference is that 40 years ago, neither the people could notice those faults as there were no cameras on the pitch. Then the number of the cameras increased in the last 20 years and now each match is usually captured from 20\25 different point of views.”
Having watched Rob Styles give a ludicrous penalty to Chelsea against Liverpool a few weeks back I can assure you guys that refereeing mistakes are not the preserve of the Italian league...the EPL is positively pickled in them.
At least we can all say Graham Poll has retired...unless seria a want him?
Here u’r making a very interesting point, mate. I’ve always thought that it could be a nice idea if we could have a continental referees association, with the same interpretation rules. This could allow us to exchange our referees. We could see an english ref refereeing in serie a or an italian ref refereeing in bundesliga. This could bring several advantages for each of us, imo. The fairness of the refs would be even more guarranteed and we all could share the same refereeing interpretation criteria.
Football today is highly globalised (as everything, btw); each year our clubs face each others in european competitions and we often see our teams complaining about the refs in champions league and uefa cup matches.
English refs are usually quite permissive, while italian ones usually use a lot their whistles.
This difference, of course, has a big influence on the game, when 2 clubs from different leagues face each others.
Premiership players usually try hard tackles as those tackles aren’t fouls in their national league, while spanish an italian players are usually more careful (a little too careful) as it’s easier to commit a foul in their own leagues.
Sharing our refs could put an end to theese difference and this would be a step foward, imo
What do u guys think about it?
P.s. i'm glad to see u posting here again, Vanzandt